My account profile
Log out
Reset password
We can view emotional intelligence from two perspectives:
1) From an experiential, embodied perspective, EI is based on an immediate awareness of the direct, felt-sense experience of bodily sensations and emotions.
2) From an abstract, cognitive perspective, EI can be viewed as a set of skills related to emotional awareness that can be developed and improved through practice.
The Experiential, Embodied Perspective on Emotional Intelligence
The ultimate source of human experience is sensations in the body. The human mind is purpose-built to recognize patterns in sensations and to derive from those patterns complex meta-sensations and knowledge.
Emotions are meta-sensations that grab the attention of the limbic system and the prefrontal cortex. They direct our attention to the most salient patterns in the environment or within our own bodymind. Emotions can be expressed through language and behavior.
Focusing mindfully on our own bodily sensations, meta-sensations, and thoughts with minimal distraction is a powerful way to develop emotional self-awareness and presence with others.
The Academic, Epistemological Perspective on Emotional Intelligence
By standing outside of our felt-sense experience — as when we listen inside to our thoughts and feelings — we can recognize abstract, conceptual patterns and relationships in the sensory-emotional experience of ourselves and others. Cognitive awareness of emotions empowers us to connect with others in more effective ways, to achieve cognitive clarity about our direct experiences, and to resolve conflicts more effectively.
Epistemology is the study of knowledge and how we know what we know. It is a foundation of academic inquiry and the pursuit of truth.
Daniel Goleman's framework is the most widely recognized model for understanding emotional intelligence from a cognitive perspective. It was popularized through his 1995 bestseller Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ.
Unlike the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso ability-based model, Goleman's is a mixed model that blends emotional abilities with personality traits, social competencies, and motivational factors.
It treats EI as a legitimate cognitive ability — a form of intelligence that can be objectively measured — rather than a collection of personality traits or competencies.
These changes came about as Webb compared definitions for emotional intelligence from multiple language models, looking for a more meaningful, universal definition that's easy to relate to for non-academics interested in the topic, and looking for pragmatic application of emotionally intelligent behaviors in human-to-human communication.
Goleman's Original Five-Domain Model (1995)
Goleman's initial framework identified five key domains:
1. Self-Awareness
Recognizing your own emotions as they occur, understanding their effects on your thoughts and behavior, and having an accurate self-assessment of your strengths and limitations. This includes emotional self-confidence.
2. Self-Regulation
Managing disruptive emotions and impulses, maintaining standards of honesty and integrity, taking responsibility for your performance, handling change flexibly, and being open to novel ideas and approaches.
3. Motivation
The internal drive to achieve beyond external rewards — striving to improve, aligning with organizational or group goals, readiness to act on opportunities, and persistence in pursuing goals despite obstacles.
4. Empathy
Sensing others' emotions, understanding their perspectives, cultivating rapport with diverse people, reading group dynamics, and recognizing the emotional currents within organizations.
5. Social Skills
Proficiency in managing relationships, inspiring and influencing others, communicating clearly, managing conflict, nurturing relationships, collaborating effectively, and building team capabilities.
Unlike the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso ability-based model, Goleman's is a mixed model that blends emotional abilities with personality traits, social competencies, and motivational factors.
The Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) ("muh-SKEET") is an ability-based measure of emotional intelligence. The test was constructed by academics John D. Mayer, Peter Salovey, and David R. Caruso at Yale and the University of New Hampshire beginning in the early 1990s in cooperation with Multi-Health Systems Inc.
It treats EI as a legitimate cognitive ability — a form of intelligence that can be objectively measured — rather than a collection of personality traits or competencies.
The Four-Branch Model of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Ability-Based Model
The framework organizes emotional intelligence into four hierarchical branches, arranged from more basic psychological processes to more complex ones:
The ability to accurately identify emotions in faces, voices, images, and cultural artifacts. This includes recognizing your own emotional states and distinguishing genuine from feigned expressions. It's the most fundamental skill because all other EI abilities depend on accurate perception.
Branch 2: Using Emotions to Facilitate Thought
The ability to harness emotions to prioritize thinking and direct attention. Different emotional states support different cognitive tasks — for instance, a mildly positive mood can enhance creative brainstorming, while a more somber mood may support careful, detail-oriented analysis. This branch concerns knowing how to leverage these states productively.
Branch 3: Understanding Emotions
The ability to comprehend emotional vocabulary and appreciate the relationships between emotions — how they blend, how they transition from one to another, and how they escalate or de-escalate. This includes understanding complex emotional scenarios ("If X happens, she'll likely feel Y, which could lead to Z").
Branch 4: Managing Emotions
The most cognitively complex branch, involving the ability to regulate emotions in yourself and others to achieve goals. This doesn't mean suppression — it means strategically engaging with or modifying emotions depending on context and purpose.